Match the commands ls, cd, pwd to their descriptions
ls lists contents of current directory
cd changes current directory
cd .. takes you up one level
cd alone takes you back home
pwd returns current directory
Given a folder structure diagram, a list of 'cd (path)' commands and target files, match the paths to the target files.
Use VSCode to create a folder. Within the folder create a .js file containing console.log('hello new world'); and save it.
Use node to execute a JavaScript file in the terminal
Plain Old JS Object Lesson Concepts
Label variables as either Primitive vs. Reference
primitives: strings, booleans, numbers, null and undefined
primitives are immutable
refereces: objects (including arrays)
references are mutable
Identify when to use . vs [] when accessing values of an object
dot syntax object.key
easier to read
easier to write
cannot use variables as keys
keys cannot begin with a number
bracket notation object["key]
allows variables as keys
strings that start with numbers can be use as keys
Write an object literal with a variable key using interpolation
put it in brackets to access the value of the variable, rather than just make the value that string
let a ="b";let obj = {a:"letter_a", [a]:"letter b"}
Use the obj[key] !== undefined pattern to check if a given variable that contains a key exists in an object
can also use (key in object) syntax interchangeably (returns a boolean)
Utilize Object.keys and Object.values in a function
Object.keys(obj) returns an array of all the keys in obj
Object.values(obj) returns an array of the values in obj
Iterate through an object using a for in loop
letprintValues=function(obj) {for (let key in obj) {let value = obj[key];console.log(value); }}
Define a function that utilizes ...rest syntax to accept an arbitrary number of arguments
...rest syntax will store all additional arguments in an array
array will be empty if there are no additional arguments
letmyFunction=function(str,...strs) {console.log("The first string is "+ str);console.log("The rest of the strings are:");strs.forEach(function(str) {console.log(str);})}
Use ...spread syntax for Object literals and Array literals
let arr1 = ["a","b","c"];let longer = [...arr1,"d","e"]; // ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]// without spread syntax, this would give you a nested arraylet withoutRest = [arr1,"d","e"] // [["a", "b", "c"], "d", "e"]
Destructure an array to reference specific elements
```javascript
let array = [35,9];
let [firstEl, secondEl] = array;
console.log(firstEl); // => 35
console.log(secondEl); // => 9
// can also destructure using ... syntax let array = [35,9,14]; let [head, ...tail] = array; console.log(head); // => 35 console.log(tail); // => [9, 14]
- Destructure an object to reference specific values-if you want to use variable names that don't match the keys, you can use aliasing-`let { oldkeyname: newkeyname } = object`- rule of thumb—only destructure values from objects that are two levels deep```javascriptlet obj = { name: "Wilfred", appearance: ["short", "mustache"], favorites: { color: "mauve", food: "spaghetti squash", number: 3 }}// with variable names that match keyslet { name, appearance } = obj;console.log(name); // "Wilfred"console.log(appearance); // ["short", "mustache"]// with new variable names (aliasing)let {name: myName, appearance: myAppearance} = obj;console.log(myName); // "Wilfred"console.log(myAppearance); // ["short", "mustache"]// in a function calllet sayHello = function({name}) {console.log("Hello, " + name); // "Hello Wilfred"}// nested objects + aliasinglet { favorites: {color, food: vegetable} } = obj;console.log(color, vegetable); //=> mauve spaghetti squash
Write a function that accepts a array as an argument and returns an object representing the count of each character in the array
// shorter version let greaterCB = function(val, callback1, callback2) { return Math.max(callback1(val), callback2(val)); } // even shorter, cause why not let greaterCB = (val, cb1, cb2) => Math.max(cb1(val), cb2(val));
Write a function, myFilter, that takes in an array and a callback as arguments. The function should mimic the behavior of Array#filter.
letmyFilter=function(array, callback) {let filtered = [];for (let i =0; i <array.length; i ++) {if (callback(array[i])) {filtered.push(array[i], i, array); } }}
Write a function, myEvery, that takes in an array and a callback as arguments. The function should mimic the behavior of Array#every.
letmyEvery=function(array, callback) {for (let i =0; i <array.length; i ++) {if (!callback(array[i], i, array)) {returnfalse } }returntrue;}// with arrow function syntaxletmyEvery= (array, callback) => {for (let i =0; i <array.length; i ++) {if (!callback(array[i])) {returnfalse } }returntrue;}
Scope Lesson Concepts
Identify the difference between const, let, and var declarations
const - cannot reassign variable, scoped to block
let - can reassign variable, scoped to block
var - outdated, may or may not be reassigned, scoped to function. can be not just reassigned, but also redeclared!
a variable will always evaluate to the value it contains regardless of how it was declared
Explain the difference between const, let, and var declarations
var is function scoped—so if you declare it anywhere in a function, the declaration (but not assignment) is "hoisted"
so it will exist in memory as "undefined" which is bad and unpredictable
var will also allow you to redeclare a variable, while let or const will raise a syntax error. you shouldn't be able to do that!
const won't let you reassign a variable, but if it points to a mutable object, you will still be able to change the value by mutating the object
block-scoped variables allow new variables with the same name in new scopes
block-scoped still performs hoisting of all variables within the block, but it doesn't initialize to the value of undefined like var does, so it throws a specific reference error if you try to access the value before it has been declared
if you do not use var or let or const when initializing, it will be declared as global—THIS IS BAD
if you assign a value without a declaration, it exists in the global scope (so then it would be accessible by all outer scopes, so bad). however, there's no hoisting, so it doesn't exist in the scope until after the line is run
Predict the evaluation of code that utilizes function scope, block scope, lexical scope, and scope chaining
scope of a program means the set of variables that are available for use within the program
global scope is represented by the window object in the browser and the global object in Node.js
global variables are available everywhere, and so increase the risk of name collisions
local scope is the set of variables available for use within the function
when we enter a function, we enter a new scope
includes functions arguments, local variables declared inside function, and any variables that were already declared when the function is defined (hmm about that last one)
for blocks (denoted by curly braces {}, as in conditionals or for loops), variables can be block scoped
inner scope does not have access to variables in the outer scope
scope chaining—if a given variable is not found in immediate scope, javascript will search all accessible outer scopes until variable is found
so an inner scope can access outer scope variables
but an outer scope can never access inner scope variables
Define an arrow function
```javascript
let arrowFunction = (param1, param2) => {
let sum = param1 + param2;
return sum;
}
// with 1 param you can remove parens around parameters let arrowFunction = param => { param += 1; return param; }
// if your return statement is one line, you can use implied return let arrowFunction = param => param + 1;
// you don't have to assign to variable, can be anonymous // if you never need to use it again param => param + 1;
```
Given an arrow function, deduce the value of this without executing the code
arrow functions are automatically bound to the context they were declared in
unlike regular function which use the context they are invoked in (unless they have been bound using Function#bind)
if you implement an arrow function as a method in an object the context it will be bound to is NOT the object itself, but the global context
so you can't use an arrow function to define a method directly
```javascript
let obj = {
name: "my object",
unboundFunc: function () {
return this.name;
// this function will be able to be called on different objects
},
boundToGlobal: () => { return this.name; // this function, no matter how you call it, will be called // on the global object, and it cannot be rebound // this is because it was defined using arrow syntax },
makeFuncBoundToObj:function () {return () => {returnthis.name; }// this function will return a function that will be bound// to the object where we call the outer method// because the arrow syntax is nested inside one of this// function's methods, it cannot be rebound},makeUnboundFunc:function () {returnfunction () {returnthis.name; }//this function will return a function that will still be unbound},immediatelyInvokedFunc:function () {returnthis.name;}(),// this property will be set to the return value of this anonymous function,// which is invoked during the object definition;// basically, it's a way to check the context inside of an object, at this momentinnerObj: { name:"inner object", innerArrowFunc: () => {returnthis.name; } // the context inside a nested object is not the parent, it's still// the global object. entering an object definition doesn't change the context},let otherObj = { name:"my other object" }// call unboundFunc on obj, we get "my object" console.log("unboundFunc: ", obj.unboundFunc()); // => "my object" // assign unboundFunc to a variable and call it let newFunc = obj.unboundFunc; // this newFunc will default to being called on global object console.log("newFunc: ",newFunc()); // => undefined // but you could bind it directly to a different object if you wanted console.log("newFunc: ", newFunc.bind(otherObj)()); // "my other object"
// meanwhile, obj.boundToGlobal will only ever be called on global object console.log("boundToGlobal: ", obj.boundToGlobal()); //=> undefined let newBoundFunc = obj.boundToGlobal; console.log("newBoundFunc: ", newBoundFunc()); // => undefined // even if you try to directly bind to another object, it won't work! console.log("newBoundFunc: ", newBoundFunc.bind(otherObj)()); // => undefined// let's make a new function that will always be bound to the context // where we call our function maker let boundFunc = obj.makeFuncBoundToObj();// note that we're invoking, not just assigning console.log("boundFunc: ", boundFunc()); // => "my object" // we can't rebind this function console.log("boundFunc: ", boundFunc.bind(otherObj)()) // =>"my object"// but if I call makeFuncBoundToObj on another context // the new bound function is stuck with that other context let boundToOther = obj.makeFuncBoundToObj.bind(otherObj)(); console.log("boundToOther: ", boundToOther()); // => "my other object" console.log("boundToOther: ", boundToOther.bind(obj)()) // "my other object"// the return value of my immediately invoked function // shows that the context inside of the object is the // global object, not the object itself // context only changes inside a function that is called // on an object console.log("immediatelyInvokedFunc: ", obj.immediatelyInvokedFunc); // => undefined// even though we're inside a nested object, the context is // still the same as it was outside the outer object // in this case, the global object console.log("innerArrowFunc: ", obj.innerObj.innerArrowFunc()); // => undefined
}
- Implement a closure and explain how the closure effects scope- a closure is "the combination of a function and the lexical environment within which that function was declared"- alternatively,"when an inner function uses or changes variables in an outer function"- closures have access to any variables within their own scope + scope of outer functions + global scope — the set of all these available variables is "lexical environemnt"- closure keeps reference to all variables **even if the outer functionhasreturned** - eachfunctionhasaprivatemutablestatethatcannotbeaccessedexternally - theinnerfunctionwillmaintainareferencetothescopeinwhichitwasdeclared. soithasaccesstovariablesthatwereinitializedinanyouterscope—evenifthatscope - ifavariableexistsinthescopeofwhatcouldhavebeenaccessedbyafunction (e.g. global scope, outer function, etc), doesthatvariablewindupintheclosureevenifitnevergotaccessed? - ifyouchangethevalueofavariable (e.g. i++) youwillchangethevalueofthatvariableinthescopethatitwasdeclaredin```javascriptfunctioncreateCounter() {// this function starts a counter at 0, then returns a// new function that can access and change that counter//// each new counter you create will have a single internal// state, that can be changed only by calling the function.// you can't access that state from outside of the function,// even though the count variable in question is initialized// by the outer function, and it remains accessible to the// inner function after the outer function returns.let count =0;returnfunction() { count ++;return count; }}let counter =createCounter();console.log(counter()); //=> 1console.log(counter()); //=> 2// so the closure here comes into play because// an inner function is accessing and changing// a variable from an outer function// the closure is the combination of the counter// function and the all the variables that existed// in the scope that it was declared in. because// inner blocks/functions have access to outer// scopes, that includes the scope of the outer// function.// so counter variable is a closure, in that// it contains the inner count value that was// initialized by the outer createCounter() function// count has been captured or closed over// this state is private, so if i run createCounter again// i get a totally separate count that doesn't interact// with the previous one and each of the new functions// will have their own internal state based on the// initial declaration in the now-closed outer functionlet counter2 =createCounter();console.log(counter2()); // => 1// if i set a new function equal to my existing counter// the internal state is shared with the new functionlet counter3 = counter2;console.log(counter3());
Define a method that references this on an object literal
when we use this in a method it refers to the object that the method is invoked on
it will let you access other pieces of information from within that object, or even other methods
method style invocation - object.method(args) (e.g. built in examples like Array#push, or String#toUpperCase)
context is set every time we invoke a function
function style invocation sets the context to the global object no matter what
being inside an object does not make the context that object! you still have to use method-style invocation
Utilize the built in Function#bind on a callback to maintain the context of this
when we call bind on a function, we get an exotic function back—so the context will always be the same for that new function
let cat = {purr:function () {console.log("meow"); },purrMore:function () {this.purr(); }, };let sayMeow =cat.purrMore; console.log(sayMeow()); // TypeError: this.purr is not a function// we can use the built in Function.bind to ensure our context, our this, // is the cat object let boundCat = sayMeow.bind(cat);boundCat(); // prints "meow"
``
-`bind` can also work with arguments, so you can have a version of a functionwithparticularargumentsandaparticularcontext. thefirstargwillbethecontextakathe `this` youwantittouse. thenextargumentswillbethefunctionsargumentsthatyouarebinding - ifyoujustwanttobindittothoseargumentsinparticular, youcanuse `null` asthefirstargument, sothecontextwon'tbebound, justthearguments- Givenacodesnippet, identifywhat `this` refersto - importanttorecognizethedifferencebetweenscopeandcontext - scope works like a dictionary that has all the variables that are available within a given block, plus a pointer back the next outer scope (which itself has pointers to new scopes until you reach the global scope. so you can think about a whole given block's scope as a kind of linked list of dictionaries) (also, this is not to say that scope is actually implemented in this way, that is just the schema that i can use to understand it)
- contextreferstothevalueofthe `this` keyword - thekeyword `this` existsineveryfunctionanditevaluatestotheobjectthatiscurrentlyinvokingthatfunction - sothecontextisfairlystraightforwardwhenwetalkaboutmethodsbeingcalledonspecificobjects - youcould, however, callanobject'smethodonsomethingotherthanthatobject, andthenthiswouldrefertothecontextwhere/howitwascalled, e.g.```javascriptlet dog = { name:"Bowser",changeName:function () {this.name ="Layla"; },};// note this is **not invoked** - we are assigning the function itselflet change =dog.changeName;console.log(change()); // undefined// our dog still has the same nameconsole.log(dog); // { name: 'Bowser', changeName: [Function: changeName] }// instead of changing the dog we changed the global name!!!console.log(this); // Object [global] {etc, etc, etc, name: 'Layla'}
CALLING SOMETHING IN THE WRONG CONTEXT CAN MESS YOU UP!
could throw an error if it expects this to have some other method or whatever that doesn't exist
you could also overwrite values or assign values to exist in a space where they should not exist
if you call a function as a callback, it will set this to be the outer function itself, even if the function you were calling is a method that was called on a particular object
let cat = {purr:function () {console.log("meow");},purrMore:function () {this.purr();},};global.setTimeout(cat.purrMore,5000); // 5 seconds later: TypeError: this.purr is not a function
we can use strict mode with "use strict"; this will prevent you from accessing the global object with this in functions, so if you try to call this in the global context and change a value, you will get a type error, and the things you try to access will be undefined
let sayMeow = cat.purrMore; console.log(sayMeow()); // TypeError: this.purr is not a function
// we can use the built in Function.bind to ensure our context, our this, // is the cat object let boundCat = sayMeow.bind(cat);
boundCat(); // prints "meow"
-`bind` can also work with arguments, so you can have a version of a functionwithparticularargumentsandaparticularcontext. thefirstargwillbethecontextakathe `this` youwantittouse. thenextargumentswillbethefunctionsargumentsthatyouarebinding - ifyoujustwanttobindittothoseargumentsinparticular, youcanuse `null` asthefirstargument, sothecontextwon'tbebound, justthearguments- Givenacodesnippet, identifywhat `this` refersto - importanttorecognizethedifferencebetweenscopeandcontext - scope works like a dictionary that has all the variables that are available within a given block, plus a pointer back the next outer scope (which itself has pointers to new scopes until you reach the global scope. so you can think about a whole given block's scope as a kind of linked list of dictionaries) (also, this is not to say that scope is actually implemented in this way, that is just the schema that i can use to understand it)
- contextreferstothevalueofthe `this` keyword - thekeyword `this` existsineveryfunctionanditevaluatestotheobjectthatiscurrentlyinvokingthatfunction - sothecontextisfairlystraightforwardwhenwetalkaboutmethodsbeingcalledonspecificobjects - youcould, however, callanobject'smethodonsomethingotherthanthatobject, andthenthiswouldrefertothecontextwhere/howitwascalled, e.g.```javascriptlet dog = { name:"Bowser",changeName:function () {this.name ="Layla"; },};// note this is **not invoked** - we are assigning the function itselflet change =dog.changeName;console.log(change()); // undefined// our dog still has the same nameconsole.log(dog); // { name: 'Bowser', changeName: [Function: changeName] }// instead of changing the dog we changed the global name!!!console.log(this); // Object [global] {etc, etc, etc, name: 'Layla'}
CALLING SOMETHING IN THE WRONG CONTEXT CAN MESS YOU UP!
could throw an error if it expects this to have some other method or whatever that doesn't exist
you could also overwrite values or assign values to exist in a space where they should not exist
if you call a function as a callback, it will set this to be the outer function itself, even if the function you were calling is a method that was called on a particular object
```javascript
let cat = {
purr: function () {
console.log("meow");
},
purrMore: function () {
this.purr();
},
};
global.setTimeout(cat.purrMore, 5000); // 5 seconds later: TypeError: this.purr is not a function
```
we can use strict mode with "use strict"; this will prevent you from accessing the global object with this in functions, so if you try to call this in the global context and change a value, you will get a type error, and the things you try to access will be undefined
POJOs
1. Label variables as either Primitive vs. Reference
Javascript considers most data types to be 'primitive', these data types are immutable, and are passed by value. The more complex data types: Array and Object are mutable, are considered 'reference' data types, and are passed by reference.
Boolean - Primitive
Null - Primitive
Undefined - Primitive
Number - Primitive
String - Primitive
Array - Reference
Object - Reference
Function - Reference
2. Identify when to use . vs [] when accessing values of an object
let obj = { "one":1,"two":2 };// Choose the square brackets property accessor when the property name is determined at// runtime, or if the property name is not a valid identifierlet myKey ="one";console.log(obj[myKey]);// Choose the dot property accessor when the property name is known ahead of time.console.log(obj.two);
3. Write an object literal with a variable key using interpolation
let keyName ="two";// If the key is not known, you can use an alternative `[]` syntax for// object initialization onlylet obj2 = { [keyName]:2 }console.log(obj2);
4. Use the obj[key] !== undefined pattern to check if a given variable that contains a key exists in an object
1. Identify the difference between const, let, and var declarations
2. Explain the difference between const, let, and var declarations
var a ="a";
var is the historical keyword used for variable declaration.
var declares variables in function scope, or global scope if not inside a function.
We consider var to be deprecated and it is never used in this course.
let b ="b";
let is the keyword we use most often for variable declaration.
let declares variables in block scope.
variables declared with let are re-assignable.
constc="c";
const is a specialized form of let that can only be used to initialize a variable.
Except when it is declared, you cannot assign to a const variable.
const scopes variables the same way that let does.
3. Predict the evaluation of code that utilizes function scope, block scope, lexical scope, and scope chaining
Consider this run function, inside which foo and bar have function scope. i and baz are scoped to the block expression.
// function and block scope in this examplefunctionrun() {var foo ="Foo";let bar ="Bar";console.log(foo, bar); {console.log(foo);let baz ="Bazz";console.log(baz); }console.log(baz); // ReferenceError}run();
Notice that referencing baz from outside it's block results in JavaScript throwing a ReferenceError.
Consider this run function, inside of which foo has function scope.
This simple construct will create a function that accepts val as a parameter, and returns val immediately. We do not need to type return val, because this is a single-line function.
Identically, we could write
constreturnValue= (val) => {return val;};
5. Given an arrow function, deduce the value of this without executing the code
If we use a function declaration style function, the this variable is set to the global object (i.e. Object [global] in Node.JS and Window in your browser).
constadder= (arr) => {console.log(this);arr.reduce( (acc, ele) => sum += ele );};adder([1,2,4,6]);
In this example, we use a fat arrow style function. Note that when we declare a funciton like this this becomes
7. Define a method that references this on an object literal