githubEdit

Neo-Async

npmarrow-up-right Travis Statusarrow-up-right Coverage Statusarrow-up-right downloadarrow-up-right Code Quality: Javascriptarrow-up-right Total Alertsarrow-up-right FOSSAarrow-up-right

Neo-Async is thought to be used as a drop-in replacement for Asyncarrow-up-right, it almost fully covers its functionality and runs faster.

Benchmark is here!

Bluebird's benchmark is herearrow-up-right!

Code Coverage

coverage

Installation

In a browser

In an AMD loader

Promise and async/await

I recommend to use Aiglearrow-up-right.

It is optimized for Promise handling and has almost the same functionality as neo-async.

Node.js

standard

replacement

Bower

Feature

JSDocarrow-up-right

* not in Async

Collections

Control Flow

Utils

Mode

Benchmark

Benchmark: Async vs Neo-Asyncarrow-up-right

How to check

Environment

  • Darwin 17.3.0 x64

  • Node.js v8.9.4

  • async v2.6.0

  • neo-async v2.5.0

  • benchmark v2.1.4

Result

The value is the ratio (Neo-Async/Async) of the average speed.

Collections

function
benchmark

each/forEach

2.43

eachSeries/forEachSeries

1.75

eachLimit/forEachLimit

1.68

eachOf

3.29

eachOfSeries

1.50

eachOfLimit

1.59

map

3.95

mapSeries

1.81

mapLimit

1.27

mapValues

2.73

mapValuesSeries

1.59

mapValuesLimit

1.23

filter

3.00

filterSeries

1.74

filterLimit

1.17

reject

4.59

rejectSeries

2.31

rejectLimit

1.58

detect

4.30

detectSeries

1.86

detectLimit

1.32

reduce

1.82

transform

2.46

sortBy

4.08

some

2.19

someSeries

1.83

someLimit

1.32

every

2.09

everySeries

1.84

everyLimit

1.35

concat

3.79

concatSeries

4.45

Control Flow

funciton
benchmark

parallel

2.93

series

1.96

waterfall

1.29

whilst

1.00

doWhilst

1.12

until

1.12

doUntil

1.12

during

1.18

doDuring

2.42

times

4.25

auto

1.97

License

FOSSA Statusarrow-up-right

Last updated